Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010119332024 2025:GAU-AS:2634 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3420/2024 BEAUTY LASKAR AND ANR D/O- MARTYR LATE BIDYADHAR LASKAR @ BIDYA LASKAR, R/O- VILL.- JAMUNA JAPONGTHAN, P.O. PANDITGHAT, P.S. HOWRAGHAT, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN- 782481. 2: KIRAN BALA LASKAR W/O- MARTYR LATE BIDYADHAR LASKAR @ BIDYA LASKAR R/O- VILL.- JAMUNA JAPONGTHAN P.O. PANDITGHAT P.S. HOWRAGHAT DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN- 782481 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:PRINCIPAL SECRETARY KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN- 782460. 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KARBI ANGLONG DIPHU ASSAM-782460. 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER/ ARO PHULONI REVENUE CIRCLE PHULONI KARBI ANGLONG Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 5:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DIPHU KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN- 782460. 6:PURNAKANTA LASKAR S/O- LATE HARURAM LASKAR R/O- VILL.- JAMUNA JAPONGTHAN P.O. PANDITGHAT P.S. HOWRAGHAT DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN- 782481. 7:SARAT LASKAR S/O- PURNA KANTA LASKAR R/O- VILL.- JAMUNA JAPONGTHAN P.O. PANDITGHAT P.S. HOWRAGHAT DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN- 782481. 8:BHARAT LASKAR S/O- PURNA KANTA LASKAR R/O- VILL.- JAMUNA JAPONGTHAN P.O. PANDITGHAT P.S. HOWRAGHAT DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN- 782481 Advocate for the Petitioner : MD B ISLAM, MR. A A MONDAL,MR S HUSSAIN,MR M HOQUE,MR A ALAM Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, MS R RAJKHOWA(R-6,7,8),MR. I H BARBHUIYA (R-6,7,8),MR. S BARUAH (GA, ASSAM),SC, K A A C BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Page No.# 3/3 Date : 12-03-2025 Heard Mr. B. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner, who prays that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition, having realised that the writ petition has been instituted by suppressing the earlier proceedings, which has already been dismissed by obtaining the power of attorney from the earlier petitioner. While taking serious exception to such conduct of the petitioner, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with a caution that the petitioner as well as the learned counsel to be careful in future. Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 and Ms. S. Kampre, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 are present. Writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant