[2025:RJ-JP:15501] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4692/2025 Rinku Chaudhary S/o Shree Shishupal Chaudhary, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 81, Mata Mritmay Colony, Shahpur, Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/04/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.88/2025 registered at Police Station Bagru, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that it is a case of no injury. It is submitted that matter has been reported to the police after four days of the alleged incident. Learned counsel contends that petitioner is not named in FIR despite the fact that petitioner and complainant are well known to each other. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner and trial will take considerable time [2025:RJ-JP:15501] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4692/2025] in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 27.02.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that it is a case of no injury, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Rinku Chaudhary S/o Shree Shishupal Chaudhary, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /357