Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13579 (KAR)

SRI S NARAYANA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/932/2022 · 2025-01-20

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2108 WP No. 932 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 932 OF 2022 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: SRI. S NARAYANA PROPRIETOR OF M/S NEW KARNATAKA ELECTRICALS AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS NO 625 DR RAJKUMAR ROAD 2ND BLOCK, RAJAJINAGARA BENGALURU - 560010 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRADEEP J.S.., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDH BENGALURU - 560001 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ELECTRICAL DIVISION K R CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560001 3. SHIVARUDRAIAH K G PROPRIETOR M/S SIDDAGANGA ENTERPRISES NO 55 10TH MAIN M C LAYOUT BINNY LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2108 WP No. 932 of 2022 VIJAYANAGARA BENGALURU - 560040 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH., AGA FOR R1 & R2 SRI. R.P. SOMASHEKHARAIAH., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE OFFICE OF THE R2 WITH RESPECT TO TENDER REFERENCE NUMBER - KPWD/2021-22/EL.WORK-INDENT 141929 RELATING TO THE PETITIONER AND R3 HEREIN QUASH ANNEXURE-L WHEREIN THE TECHNICAL BID OF THE R3 IS ACCEPTED BY PLACING HIM AS L1 TENDERER AND CONSEQUENTLY DISQUALIFY THE R3 AS INELEGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE TENDER PROCESS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 15.01.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition has not pressed. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2108 WP No. 932 of 2022 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL