HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1286 of 2024 Isran and Others ...Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand ….Respondent Present:- Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the applicants, through video conferencing. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicants-Isran, Taufik and Rihan seek anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 898 of 2024, under Sections 3, 5, 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 and Section 3, 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. According to the FIR, on 18.12.2024, police raided a premises and recovered beef and other articles, but the applicants managed to escape. 4. It is the case of the applicants that nothing was recovered from them; they have been named in the FIR without any basis. 5. Learned State Counsel would submit that no separate objection is required to be filed, as such. The anticipatory bail application may be decided based on the 2 material available on record. She would submit that when the police reached at the spot, the applicants managed to escape. 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 7. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 8. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicants shall be enlarged on bail on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“AO”). In addition to it, the applicants shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall co-operate with the investigation. (ii) The applicants shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (iii) The applicants shall not leave the country without prior permission of the court concerned. (iv) The applicants shall deposit their passports with the AO. The passports may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case the applicants do not have passport, they shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicants shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 07.01.2025 Ravi Bisht RAVI BISHT Digitally signed by RAVI BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=ded921477e34a304cbcb0b52d4a59f37e6d201 8d38d0b669a5c068799391e6bb, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AA64B1F44E60E652AE5485ED764961E4E 52FD29C6F03C20917020ED093405536, cn=RAVI BISHT Date: 2025.01.07 20:59:21 +05'30'