Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 135760 (ALL)

PANCHAMUKHI HANUMAN JI VIRAJMAN MANDIR PANCHMUKHI THRU. MANHANTH/SARVARHKAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. P.W.D. U.P. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/3910/2025 · 2025-04-25

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23893-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3910 of 2025 Petitioner :- Panchamukhi Hanuman Ji Virajman Mandir Panchmukhi Thru. Manhanth/Sarvarhkar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. P.W.D. U.P. Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Narayan Pandey,Niteesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, leaned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners claim certain rights in respect of the land mentioned in the relief clause which is Nazool land. 3. The apprehension is that compensation in respect of the said land which has been acquired is proposed to be given to opposite party no. 7 and 8, however, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State has instructions that land being nazool land no compensation is proposed to be given to the said opposite parties. 4. Nothing survives for adjudication in the matter. The petitioner may pursue other remedies as may be prescribed in law. 5. If the petitioners is aggrieved further the petitioner may avail other remedies, as, we can not see these issues under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 25.4.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench