HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3694 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for the applicants is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 and perused the material placed on record. 3. By means of the instant application, the applicants have prayed to quash the proceedings of criminal case no. 9904 of 2023 arising out of F.I.R. No. 211 of 2022 under Sections 323, 504, 506, 354(a), 354(b) I.P.C., police station Patti, district Pratapgarh as well as bailable warrant dated 19.11.2024 and the summoning order dated 23.5.2023. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to certain misunderstanding, the instant F.I.R. was lodged against the applicants. He added that later on, the parties sat together and have amicably settled their disputes, which has been reduced in writing on 3.4.2025. Thereafter, the applicants filed an Applications U/S 482 No. 3694 of 2025 a wherein this Court vide order dated 1.5.2025 has directed the court below to verify the said compromise deed and in compliance thereof, the compromise deed was verified on 12.5.2025. He submits that now there is no dispute in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rahul Mishra Ved Prakash Tiwari @ Ankush And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) between the parties and they have settled their dispute. He submits that further criminal proceedings in the instant matter would amount to harassment and, thus, the instant criminal proceedings against the applicants may be quashed. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has also supported the version of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the opposite party no.2 has no grievance, hence, criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped. 6. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submissions aforesaid. 7. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 3.4.2025 and said compromise has been verified on 12.5.2025 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned criminal proceedings against the applicants. 8. In view of the above, as the applicants and opposite parties have entered into compromise on 3.4.2025 and no grievance remains to be agitated and, as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgments of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003) 4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2008) 9 SCC 677; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others, (2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466. 9. Accordingly, entire criminal proceedings against the applicants in A482 No. 3694 of 2025 2 criminal case no. 9904 of 2023 arising out of F.I.R. No. 211 of 2022 under Sections 323, 504, 506, 354(a), 354(b) I.P.C., police station Patti, district Pratapgarh as well as bailable warrant dated 19.11.2024 and the summoning order dated 23.5.2023 are hereby quashed. 10. The compromise shall be part of this order. 11. The application is allowed accordingly. 12. Consigned to the records. September 11, 2025 kanhaiya A482 No. 3694 of 2025 3 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench