Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13566 (AP)

KONA RAMAKRISHNA RAO, VIIANAGARAM. v. SMT. KONA RAMA LAKSHMI, VIIANAGARAM DIST., & 2 ANO.

FCA/117/2009 · 2025-09-11

Battu Devanand, Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010163372009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3555] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 117/2009 Between: 1. KONA RAMAKRISHNA RAO, VIIANAGARAM., S/O. KONA ATCHAYYA RATION DEPOT DEALER R/O. D.NO. 12-3-55, KOTHAPETA, GOLLA VEEDHI, VIZIANAGARAM. ...APPELLANT AND 1. SMT KONA RAMA LAKSHMI VIIANAGARAM DIST 2 ANO, W/O. KONA RAMAKRISHNA RAO AT PRESENT ANGANVADI WORKER, R/O. D.NO. 12-3-55, KOTHAPETA, GOLLA VEEDHI, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN. 2. KUM KONA ANUSHA YADAV, D/O. K.RAMAKRISHNA RAO STUDYING INTERMEDIATE 1ST YEAR REST-DO- REP. BY MOTHER R.1 3. KUM KONA DEEPTHI YADAV, D/O. K.RAMAKRISHNA RAO STUDYING 8TH CLASS REST-DO- REP. BY MOTHER R.1 ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal against orders to allow this appeal by set aside the decree and judgment in FCOP No. 110/2008 on the file of Judge Family Court, Vizianagaram, dated 02.03.2009 in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 238 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of the proceedings relating to the recovery of arrears of maintenance during pendency these proceedings in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. D RAVISHANKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KRISHNA RAO MODHALAVALASA 2. KRISHNA RAO M The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.117 of 2009 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) On 29.08.2025, there was no representation for the appellant. Therefore, the matter was posted to today ‘for dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. 2. It appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute this Appeal. 3. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND _____________________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Dated: 12.09.2025 TM THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.117 of 2009 Dt.12.09.2025 tm