Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 135635 (ALL)

ANISHA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BAL VIKASH SEVA EVAM PUSHTAHAR LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/4399/2025 · 2025-04-22

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22724 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4399 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anisha Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikash Seva Evam Pushtahar Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Aslam Beg Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 5 and perused the record. Notices to respondents no. 6 and 7 are dispensed with. 2. By this petition the petitioner has prayed following reliefs:- "I. Issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the like nature thereby quashing the list of candidates to be called for verification of all education and other records/ documents contained in Annexure No.8 of the writ petition and further directed to respondents to prepare the fresh merit list strictly in accordance with the minimum qualification pursuance to the advertisement issued and not on the basis of Graduation or Post Graduation as there is preference qualification prescribed under the relevant Government Order. II. Issue writ of mandamus directing to opposite party no.4 to consideration of her candidature for the post of Anganbadi Karyakatri by allowing petitioner to submit her Post Graduation Degree which petitioner could not submit due to technical flaw while filling up online application form. III. Make any other order or direction as is deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice that he be granted liberty to file a fresh representation to opposite party no. 4, who may be directed to decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 4. In view of above, without entering into merit of the case, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation before the opposite party no.4 within two weeks from today. In case the said representation is submitted, the opposite party no.4 shall decide the same within further period of four weeks, by passing a speaking and reasoned order. Order Date :- 22.4.2025/Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench