PRAHALAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/3463/2025 · 2025-04-23
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135634 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135634 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22970 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3463 of 2025 Applicant :- Prahalad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sukh Deo Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Heard Shri Anant Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sukh Deo Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (now 528 of B.N.S.S.) by the applicants with the following prayer:-
" Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be leased to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 05/03/2022 along with summoning order dated 15/10/2022 in "State Vs. Prahlad" arising out of FIR No. 017/2022 U/Ss. 342, 323, 504, 323, 506 IPC Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur and as contained in Annexure no. 1 and 2 to this petition. "
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 . 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 BNSS is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court concerned, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 6.
Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicants apply for bail, whichever is earlier, they would not take any coercive action against the applicants in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 Ashish Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench