Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13563 (KAR)

M/S SHAAN ENTERPRISES v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1150/2022 · 2025-03-17

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11514 WP No. 1150 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 1150 OF 2022 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S SHAAN ENTERPRISES REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR C MOHAMMED NAZEER AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS CLASS-I ELECTRICAL AND CIVIL CONTRACTOR LIG-T-5 KUNJATHBAIL MANGALURU - 575 015 OFFICE ADDRESS SHOP NO.8, BASEMENT, MCC COMMERCIAL COMPLEX LALBAGH, MANGALURU D K - 575 003 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PATGAR NARENDRA HANUMANT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001 Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11514 WP No. 1150 of 2022 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER KUWS AND D BOARD, MYSURU ZONE NO.927, 6TH MAIN, NEW KANTHARAJ URS ROAD SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSURU - 570 009 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUWS AND D BOARD DIVISION MANGALURU, MALLIKATTE MANGALURU D K DISTRICT - 575 002 4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUWS AND D BOARD DIVISION MANGALURU MALLIKATEE MANGALURU D K DISTRICT - 575 002 5. HYDROFLO ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. NO.81/C ROAD NO.8 JIGANI INDUSTRIAL AREA BENGALURU - 562 106 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. VEERESH R. BUDIHAL, ADV. FOR R2 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH ORDER PASSED BY THE R2 THE ANNEXURE-T VIDE ORDER DATED 30.10.2021 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11514 WP No. 1150 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The coordinate Bench of this Court on 28.08.2024 had passed the following: " The petition is challenging the impugned order at Annexure-T dated 30.10.2021 wherein, the tender of the contract awarded in favour of the petitioner has been cancelled due to fundamental breach of terms and conditions of the contract and further directing re- tendering of the work. The respondent-authorities have notified the re-tendering of the work as per Annexure-W. The petition is dated 12.01.2022, no interim order is passed by this Court. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and respondent Nos.2 to 5. Considering the nature of work and re-tender notification, the petition may not survive for further consideration. However, to enable the respective parties to make their submission, list this matter on 31.08.2024." 2. There was no representation on the said date. There is no representation even today. 3. The learned High Court Government Pleader on instructions and verification of the records would submit that the petition is rendered infructuous by efflux of time. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:11514 WP No. 1150 of 2022 4. In view of the said submission, the petition is thus disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 104