Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13562 (UTT)

JUMMA KHAN AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1411/2024 · 2025-03-20

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1411 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Divya Prakash Mittal, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Mani Kumar, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.3. 4. It is contended by learned State Counsel that after investigation, final report has been submitted against the petitioners including those who are not petitioners in this writ petition. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 20.03.2025 AK