( 2025:JHHC:15687 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4175 of 2025 ------ Dr. Nirmal Murmu @ Nirmal Murmu, aged about 32 years, son of Chunku Murmu, resident of Village-Madhuban, P.O. & P.S.-Littipara, Dist.-Pakur (Jharkhand) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. No.3, Advocate : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Pratyush, Advocate For the State : Mr. Navin Kr. Singh, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 16.06.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Amrapara P.S. Case No.15 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 191(2)/ 191(3)/ 190/ 126(2)/127(2)/137(2)/308(2)/308(3)/308(5)/305(a)/74/76/109/351 (2)/352 of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly outraged the modesty of the informant, attempted to murder the informant and also indulged in extortion. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is then submitted that the petitioner is a professor in S.K.M. University, Dumka and on the date of occurrence, he was present at the Convention Centre, Agro Park, Dumka in the programme organized by the student’s union. It is also submitted that there is an unexplained delay of one day in lodging of the FIR. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.15 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.03.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail application and charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Pakur, in connection with Amrapara P.S. Case No.15 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/