Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 135616 (ALL)

SHYAMATA PRASAD v. SETTLEMENT OFFICER OF CONSOLIDATION, AYODHYA AND 2 OTHERS

A227/2292/2025 · 2025-04-22

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22775 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2292 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shyamata Prasad Respondent :- Settlement Officer Of Consolidation, Ayodhya And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Shukla,Shyam Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "a. issue order or direction to the opposite party no.1 to consider and decide the interim relief application dated 18.12.2024 in Appeal No.T-B/409, under section 11(1) of U.P.C.H. Act, Shyamta Prasad V/s Nirmal Kumar and others within stipulated period, as fixed by this Hon'ble court, in the interest of justice. b. Direct the opposite party no.1 to stay the impugned order dated 30.06.1987 passed by Consolidation Officer, Barabanki (now Ayodhya) in Case No.11301 and 11302, U/s-9A(2) of U.P.C.H. Act, during pendency of the appeal, in the interest of justice." Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case and period of pendency of the application in issue, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Authority concerned namely Settlement Officer of Consolidation, District Ayodhya, to consider and decide the interim relief application in issue, indicated in above quoted prayer clause of this petition, on the next date fixed in the case, if possible, and if it is not possible, then within a period of two months from the next date fixed in the case, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 22.4.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench