Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1238 of 2025 Appellant :- Sunil Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. In view of the defect reported by the office that the signature of the deponent required at page no.22, the deponent has made the signatures and thereafter learned counsel for the appellant made an endorsement that the deponent signature at Page No.22 got made as per Rules, whereas on a query being put he failed to disclose any Rule under which once an affidavit is made, how the signatures can be made on the affidavit. In view of above,Sri Subodh Kumar Pandey,Advocate holding brief of Sri Ramakar Shukla, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh with proper affidavit. To which there is no objection by learned AGA. In view of above, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. As prayed by learned counsel for the appellant, office is directed to return the certified copy/copies annexed with this appeal to learned counsel for the appellant after keeping the photocopy/photocopies of the same on record in accordance with law. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 Akanksha Sri/- Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench