Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13560 (AP)

SHAIK SULTHAN BI @ RAZIA SULTAN BI AND ANOTHER, v. SHAIK NAGUL MEERA AND ANOTHER,

CRLRC/1185/2010 · 2025-07-28

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010162572010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1185/2010 Between: 1. SHAIK SULTHAN BI @ RAZIA SULTAN BI AND ANOTHER,, W/O. NAGULMEERA, R/O. D.NO. -6-846/10, 5TH LINE, SANJEEVAIAH NAGAR, 2. SHAIK JAHERA,, D/O. NAGULMEERA, BEING MINOR, REP BY HER MOTHER, 1ST PETITIONER HEREIN ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SHAIK NAGUL MEERA AND ANOTHER, S/O. MOULALI @ RAVULAPADU MOULALI, R/O. RAVELA VILLAGE, TADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Memoarndum of Criminal Revision Case being filed aggrieved by the order dt.20.04.2010 passed in M.C.NO. 80 of 2009 by the Family Judge-cum-Addl. District Judge, Guntur IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP 1693 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim maintenance to the 1st petitioner to be paid by the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MUTYALA SOBHANADRI NAIDU 2. LEGAL AID Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. - 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3. P MOHAN RAO 4. LEGAL AID THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.1185 of 2010 ORDER: On 01.07.2025, this Court directed the Station House Officer, Arundelpet Police Station, to record the statements of the parties in M.C.No.80 of 2009 and submit a report. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.2- State are present. 3. Report received from the Station House Officer, which shows that the petitioners and respondent No.1 herein have compromised the matter and have been living together and continuing their conjugal life from the past three years. 4. In view of the report, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as cause does not survive. No order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 29.07.2025 M K K THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.1185 of 2010 Date: 29.07.2025 M K K 123 186 7