MR.CHETAN ANAND & ANR. v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
CRL.M.C./2041/2025 · 2025-07-01
Girish Kathpalia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13558 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13558 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL.M.C.2041/2025
Page 1 of 2 pages $~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %
Date of Decision: 01.07.2025 + CRL.M.C. 2041/2025 & CRL.M.A. 9191/2025 (stay)
MR.CHETAN ANAND & ANR.
.....Petitioners Through: Counsel for petitioners (appearance not given)
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kushank Sidhu (through videoconferencing) and Mr. Parth Kaushal, Advocates for R-2 with SI Abhishek Rana and Insp. Ramesh Chand Meena, PS Dwarka South.
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
1. Subsequent to order dated 15.04.2025, the divorce decree sheet was filed. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have appeared today in person, identified by their respective counsel and IO/SI Abhishek. As regards petitioner no.2, her appearance was dispensed with on 15.04.2025 as she is a senior citizen.
2. Petitioners have sought quashing of FIR No. 88/2019 of PS Dwarka, South for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC as they have compromised the disputes with the complainant de facto (respondent no.2). GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.07.01 18:06:58 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:01.07.2025 18:32:28 Signature Not Verified
CRL.M.C.2041/2025
Page 2 of 2 pages
3. I have spoken with the parties present today. It is submitted by both sides that they have settled all matrimonial disputes amicably and their marriage already stands dissolved by way of decree of divorce dated
03.05.2025. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have one son born out of their wedlock and his custody shall remain with petitioner no.1 with visitation rights available to respondent no.2. Towards full and final settlement amount, the balance amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- is paid by petitioner no. 1 today in Court by way of demand draft to respondent no.2, who submits that she does not wish to pursue prosecution of the petitioners.
4. Having spoken with the parties, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push them through trial. Therefore, the petition is allowed and accordingly, the FIR No. 88/2019 of PS Dwarka, South for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and the consequent proceedings are quashed.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) JULY 1, 2025/DR
GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.07.01 18:07:20 +05'30' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:01.07.2025 18:32:28