LAXMI NARAIN AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIB/378/2025 · 2025-04-28
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135576 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135576 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24021 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 378 of 2025 Petitioner :- Laxmi Narain And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Lakhan,Km. Romi Verma,Shri Nivas Rathore Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners as also Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State Counsel and perused the records. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-
"i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of 'mandamus' commanding and directing to the opposite parties to stay the consolidation proceeding in the revenue village Deogaon District Unnao. ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of 'mandamus' commanding the directing to the opposite party No.2 to set up the enquiry against the Assistant Consolidation Officer Darauli Unnao Sri Anil Kumar Singh, Revenue Inspector Sri Praveen Kumar and local Lekhpal Sri Sher Singh in regard to irregularities committed by them in the light of representation-cum-complaint dated 28.03.2025 (Annexure No.4) made by the petitioners." Taking note of the pronouncements of this Court on the issue rendered in the case(s) of Suraj Bhan vs. Director, Consolidation, Uttar Pradesh reported in 2006 LawSuit(All) 971, Runup Gramodyog Evam Sewa Sansthan Versus State of U.P. and Others reported in 2022 (155) RD 497 and Daswant Ram Versus Consolidation Commissioner and Others reported in 2015 (126) RD 669, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition for the main relief sought, quoted above. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of finally with liberty to the petitioner to prefer a detailed representation in terms of Rule 17 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954 (in short "Rules of 1954"), which shall be considered and decided by the Authority concerned in the light of law on the subject including Rule 17 of the Rules of 1954, most expeditiously. Order Date :- 28.4.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench