RAJNEESH KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR FAIZABAD/AYODHYA AND 18 OTHERS
A227/2366/2025 · 2025-04-30
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135566 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135566 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24737 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2366 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajneesh Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector Faizabad/Ayodhya And 18 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anshuman Pandey,Aishwarya Priya,Ankit Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Badrish Kumar Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and perused the material available on record.
2. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with.
3. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief:-
"I. Issue a direction thereby directing the opposite party no.2 to decide the Case No.233/234/235/236 "Ram Sundar Vs. Ram Chandar and others" filed under section 9A(2) of U.P. C.H. Act, pending before the court of Consolidation Officer Sadar, District Ayodhya, expeditiously within stipulated period as early as possible (Annexure No.1 to this petition), in the interest of justice."
4. Shri Badrish Kumar Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel based upon the instructions received from the District Magistrate, Ayodhya, a copy of which is taken on record, states that the case in issue shall be decided most expeditiously say within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case.
5. Taking note of the aforesaid statement made by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, the opposite party no.2- Consolidation Officer, Sadar, District- Ayodhya is directed to consider and decide the Case No.233/234/235/236 (Ram Sundar Vs. Ram Chandar and others) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case.
6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Anand/- Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench