APHC010164192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 8684 of 2025 Between: P.Bhoopalan The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents The Court made the following order Heard Sri Akula Sri Krishna Sai Bhargav petitioner and learned Assistant Government appearing for the respondents. 2. The writ petition is filed challenging the respondents' action in not considering the petitioner's representation dated 21.02.2025 for transfer of the Quarry Lease, sought vide application dated 04.07.2016, in respect of a Quarry Lease for Colour Granite over an extent of 4.640 Hectares in Sy.No.Gap Area of Suparvarajapuram Village, S.R.Puram Mandal District, granted initially in favour of one IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 8684 of 2025 ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Akula Sri Krishna Sai Bhargav Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Mines and Geology The Court made the following order: Akula Sri Krishna Sai Bhargav, learned counsel for the Assistant Government for Mines and Geology for the respondents. The writ petition is filed challenging the respondents' action in not 's representation dated 21.02.2025 for transfer of the Quarry Lease, sought vide application dated 04.07.2016, in respect of a Quarry Lease for Colour Granite over an extent of 4.640 Hectares in Area of Suparvarajapuram Village, S.R.Puram Mandal District, granted initially in favour of one Sendil Kumar. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) Akula Sri Krishna Sai Bhargav GP for Mines and Geology learned counsel for the for Mines and Geology The writ petition is filed challenging the respondents' action in not 's representation dated 21.02.2025 for transfer of the Quarry Lease, sought vide application dated 04.07.2016, in respect of a Quarry Lease for Colour Granite over an extent of 4.640 Hectares in Area of Suparvarajapuram Village, S.R.Puram Mandal, Chittoor 3. The petitioner contends that they have filed an application in the prescribed format before the appropriate authorities seeking the transfer of quarry lease for colour granite for the unexpired portion of the lease, which is up to 06.08.2032. However, no orders have been passed on the said application. 4. It is contended that pursuant to the said application, a survey and inspection were conducted by the respondent authorities. However, the petitioner could not participate in the said survey due to his health issues. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a representation dated 22.01.2024, seeking a request for the authorities to conduct the inspection and survey regarding the transfer of the application. 5. Today, when the matter was taken up for admission, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for the respondents stated that the application filed transfer of the quarry lease had been withdrawn by the said Sendil Kumar. Thus, it is contended that the petitioner has no right to seek transfer of the lease for the unexpired portion. 6. Having regard to the contentions advanced, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner, in accordance with the law, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 10.04.2025 BSK 53 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 8684 of 2025 Date: 10.04.2025 BSK