VINAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. GRAMYA VIKAS and ANR.
WRIA/8105/2006 · 2025-04-24
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135539 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135539 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23506 Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8105 of 2006 Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Gramya Vikas And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- V.K. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Sri V.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner submits submits that this writ petition has been become infructuous.
3. In view of the statement made as above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
4. Interim order, if any, stands discharged. . [Brij Raj Singh, J.] Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench