Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 135525 (ALL)

RAJ KUMARI SINGH v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/3396/2025 · 2025-04-24

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23531 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3396 of 2025 Applicant :- Raj Kumari Singh Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Singh,Anil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed by the applicant for quashing the impugned order dated 22.01.2025 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), FTC, C rime against Women, Unnao in complaint Case No.379/2023 (Smt. Kavita Singh Vs. Prashant Singh and others) under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, police station Auras, District Unnao. 3. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application and seeks liberty to move an application for discharge through counsel before the trial court and the same may be decided by the learned trial court in a time bound manner. 4. Accordingly, it is provided that in case, the applicants move an appropriate application for discharge through counsel before the concerned Court below within a period of fifteen days from today, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months in accordance with law, by the concerned trial court. 5. With the aforesaid directions, this petition is finally disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 24.4.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench