IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9424/2025 Decided on: 18.06.2025 Yash Pal …Petitioner Versus Dr. Y.S. Parmar University & Anr. ….. Respondents .....…………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Ravi Tegta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of subsequent developments, whereby respondent No.1 has rejected petitioner’s representation, he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action for assailing the rejection order. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Granting liberty as prayed for, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 18th June, 2025 (rohit)