Smt. Kunduru Venkata Ramanamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/2579/2017 · 2025-06-26
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13546 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13546 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010163662017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: Between:
1. SMT. KUNDURU VENKATA RAMANAMMA,, W/O. VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC : CONTRACT RESIDENTIAL TEACHER, WORKED IN KGBV, HM PADU, RIO. CHAKIRALA VILLAGE, KANIGIRI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, APSSA, STATE PROJECT OFFICE, SCERT PREMISES, SIEMAT STADIUM, HYDERABAD
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CHAIRMAN, APSSA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. (ANDHRA PRADESH SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN)
4. THE PROJECT OFFICER APSSA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 5. THE SPECIAL OFFICER APSSA, DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2579/2017 SMT. KUNDURU VENKATA RAMANAMMA,, W/O. VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC : CONTRACT RESIDENTIAL TEACHER, WORKED IN KGBV, HM PADU, RIO. CHAKIRALA VILLAGE, KANIGIRI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. THE STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, APSSA, STATE PROJECT OFFICE, SCERT PREMISES, SIEMAT BUILDING, B-BLOCK, OPP: LB STADIUM, HYDERABAD-01. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CHAIRMAN, APSSA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. (ANDHRA PRADESH SARVA SIKSHA THE PROJECT OFFICER APSSA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. THE SPECIAL OFFICER APSSA, KGBV, HM PADU, PRAKASAM ...RESPONDENT(S):
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3504] TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM SMT. KUNDURU VENKATA RAMANAMMA,, W/O. VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC : CONTRACT RESIDENTIAL TEACHER, WORKED IN KGBV, HM PADU, RIO. CHAKIRALA VILLAGE, KANIGIRI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, THE STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, APSSA, STATE PROJECT BLOCK, OPP: LB THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CHAIRMAN, APSSA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. (ANDHRA PRADESH SARVA SIKSHA THE PROJECT OFFICER APSSA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE.
KGBV, HM PADU, PRAKASAM ...RESPONDENT(S):
2 HMRK,J
W.P.No.2579 of 2017
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents in renewing the petitioner as Contract Residential Teacher in KGBV, HM Padu, Prakasam District despite the request letters from 5th respondent to the 3rd and 4th respondents to renew/service of the petitioner for the academic year 2016-2017 as illegal, arbitrary and discriminative and violative of principles of natural justice and violation of article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Contract Residential Teacher, mathematics subject in KGBV, HM Padu, Prakasam District and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deems fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Y NAGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP)
2. REVANURU SUDHA RANI (SC FOR SAMAGRA SHIKSHA)
3. VAKA KRANTHI SRI
3 HMRK,J
W.P.No.2579 of 2017
The Court made the following Order:
Sri N.Rama Krishna, learned counsel representing Sri Y.Nagi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of subsequent events, no cause survives in this Writ Petition. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J
Dated: 27.06.2025 MDP