PAWAN KUMAR AND 10 OTHERS v. CANE COMMISSIONER U.P. LUCKNOW AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/2347/2006 · 2025-04-24
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135457 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135457 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23367
Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2347 of 2006 Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar And 10 Others Respondent :- Cane Commissioner U.P. Lucknow And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Madhu Singh,Paramanand Asthana Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Case is called out in the revised list.
2. None is present for the petitioner(s) when this case is taken up for hearing while learned Standing Counsel for the State is available. No request for adjournment has either been made on behalf of the petitioner(s). Sri Paramanand Asthana, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
3. From perusal of the record, it appears that since this matter pertains to the year 2006, petitioner has lost his interest in pursuing his case. Even otherwise, by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. . [Brij Raj Singh, J.] Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench