Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13542 (GAU)

MD SUBED ALI v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS.

WP(C)/3450/2025 · 2025-06-23

Acting, Manash Ranjan Pathak

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010118902025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3450/2025 MD SUBED ALI S/O MD. AKIN ALI, R/O VILL- NO. 1 BORKUR, P.S.- BHURAGAON, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782121 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-110001 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSION NIRVACHAN SADAN ASHOKA ROAD NEW DELHI-110001 4:THE STATE COORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTRATION OF CITIZENS ASSAM 1ST FLOOR ACHYUT PLAZA G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN-781005 Page No.# 2/3 5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MORIGAON DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782105 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER) MORIGAON DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782105 7:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE BHURAGAON POLICE STATION DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-78212 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. D GHOSH, MR A.K. HAJONG,MR. S. K. CHAKMA,MR I CHAKMA,MS N DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, F.T,SC, NRC,SC, ECI,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) MR. LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK O R D E R 24.06.2025 (L.S. Jamir, C.J(Acting) Ms. N. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this writ petition. Ms. L. Devi, learned CGC appears for the respondent No.1; Mr. N. Pathak, Page No.# 3/3 learned standing counsel, Home Department appears for the respondent Nos. 2, 6 and 7; Mr. J. Payeng, learned standing counsel, NRC appears for the respondent No.4 and Mr. D. K. Sarma, learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate appears for the respondent No.5. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) Comparing Assistant