Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1354 (CHH)

AMITA SHRIVASTAVA v. SMT. KAMLESH NANDINI SAHU

CONT/48/2025 · 2025-03-26

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:14504 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 48 of 2025 1 - Amita Shrivastava W/o Shailendra Kumar Shrivastava Aged About 49 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer, (L B) At Government, Higher Secondary School, Karvan, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh --- petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Kamlesh Nandini Sahu Chief Executive OfÏcer, Zila Panchayat, Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ram Lalit Patel District Education OfÏcer Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) CONT No. 77 of 2025 1 - Kamla Yadav W/o Pushpraj Yadav Aged About 55 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer, (L B) At Government, Higher Secondary School, Karvan, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Smt. Kamlesh Nandini Sahu Chief Executive OfÏcer, Zila Panchayat, Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ram Lalit Patel District Education OfÏcer, Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For petitioners : Ms. Seema Verma , Adv. For Respondent/s : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Adv ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Order on Board 26.03.2025 Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.03.27 10:53:09 +0530 2 1) The instant contempt petitions have been filed by the petitioners herein, alleging non-compliance of this Court’s order dated 21.12.2023 & 03.01.2024 passed in WPS No. 9616/2023 and WPS No. 9659/2023. 2) Learned counsel for parties submit that order passed by this Court has already been complied with. 3) Given the said submission made by the counsel for the learned counsel for parties, this Court is of view that the order passed by this Court stands complied with. The respondents stand discharged of the contempt proceedings. 4) Accordingly, both contempt petitions stand finally disposed of. 5) However, the right of the petitioners would stands reserved to assail the subsequent order passed by the respondents in an appropriate proceedings. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti