VIKAS SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/347/2025 · 2025-05-05
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135351 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135351 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26017 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 347 of 2025 Applicant :- Vikas Srivastava Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashwani Kumar Singh,Anurag Singh,Bal Keshwar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Prashant Vikram Singh Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of complainant is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of State and Mr. Prashant Vikram Singh learned counsel for informant and perused the record. This first anticipatory bail application has been filed with regard to Case Crime No. 61 of 2025 under Section 109(1), 352, 351(2) BNS, Police Station Kotwali Patti, District Pratapgarh. As per contents of FIR, the incident is said to have taken place on 7th March, 2025 at about 12.00 P.M. when the applicant alongwith co-accused is said to have attacked and injured the informant. The allegation of firing upon the informant has also been levelled. It has been submitted by learned counsel for applicant that he has been falsely implicated in the charges levelled against him and that altercation had taken place between two groups of lawyers but evidently no injury has been caused. It is submitted that applicant is willing to cooperate in the investigation. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for informant have opposed bail application with submission that contents of F.I.R. clearly indicate allegations levelled against the applicant. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions submitted that the applicant is not cooperating in the investigation due to which a bounty of Rs. 50,000/- has also been imposed upon him. Upon consideration of submissions advanced by learned counsel for parties and upon perusal of material on record, particularly considering the aspect that applicant is not
cooperating in the investigation, this Court does not find good ground to entertain the anticipatory bail. Liberty however is granted to the applicant to apply regular bail. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 prabhat Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench