SUSHIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 8 OTHERS
WRIC/3786/2025 · 2025-04-22
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22741-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3786 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Kumar,Indra Kumar Yadav,Priya Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Mr. Anurag Singh, learned Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 7 which is taken on record.
2. Heard.
3. The appeal of the petitioner under Section 24 (4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is already pending wherein it is claimed that some interim order has been passed on 21.09.2024, however, Mr. Manish Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel has instructions to inform the Court that the order impugned in the said appeal was passed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 by the Sub Divisional Magistrate concerned on 27.02.2019 and the Patthar Nasab took place on 23.11.2019 itself, thereafter the petitioner sought to disturb the pillars installed in compliance of the order dated 27.02.2019, therefore, the subsequent action has been taken.
4. The Additional Commissioner (Administration) where the proceedings under Section 24 (4) of the Code, 2006 are pending is directed to decide the appeal, positively, within two months. Petitioner can raise all pleas before the appellate authority.
5. The writ petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 22.4.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench