NAGAON DISTRICT AUTHORISED TRAVEL AGENCY OWNERS ASSOCIATION AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
WP(C)/3033/2025 · 2025-06-04
Arun Dev Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13534 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13534 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010119122025
2025:GAU-AS:7388
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3033/2025 NAGAON DISTRICT AUTHORISED TRAVEL AGENCY OWNERS ASSOCIATION AND ANR A REGISTERED ORGANIZATION REP BY HE HAIDER ALI 2: HAIDAR ALI S/O LT SAFAR ALI R/O BHUYAN PATTY SOUTH HAIBARGAON PO HAIBORGAON PS NAGAON SADAR DSIT NAGAON ASSAM PIN 78200 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REP BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM TRANSPORT DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 2:THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER NAGAON CUM SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY NAGAON DIST NAGAON ASSAM PIN 782002 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER NAGAON DIST NAGAON ASSAM 782002 4:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE NAGAON DIST NAGAON ASSAM 78200 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S BORTHAKUR, MR. P K MEDHI,MS. P BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : SC. TRANPORT DEPTT., GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 05-06-2025
1. Heard Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. D. Saikia, learned Advocate General, Assam assisted by Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondents.
2. The basic grievance raised in this writ petition is that the provision of Rule 73 of the Assam Motor Vehicle Rules, 2003, has not been followed while issuing the impugned Notice annexed to this petition as Annexure-12.
3. In the backdrop of the aforesaid allegation, this Court had requested Mr. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate, Assam to produce the record relatable to the decision in question to verify whether the procedure has been followed or not. Accordingly, Mr. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate, Assam has produced the same before the Court.
4. Mr. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioners has also gone through the record and in his usual fairness, he has submitted that substantially the aforesaid Rule has been followed and accordingly, this writ petition may be closed with a liberty to the petitioners to assail the decision itself, based on which the Annexure-12 was issued, if so advised.
5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed with a liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant