DINDAYAL AGARWAL @ JALAN v. SMTI. RATNI DEVI JALAN and ANR
Cont.Cas(C)/552/2016 · 2025-09-14
Kardak Ete
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13532 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13532 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010118782016
2025:GAU-AS:12560
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/552/2016 DINDAYAL AGARWAL @ JALAN S/O LT. BHANIRAM AGARWAL, R/O H/NO.31, BENI KUNJ, KRISHNA NAGAR, CHATRIBARI ROAD, GHY-1, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM VERSUS SMTI. RATNI DEVI JALAN and ANR W/O LT. CHOUTMAL JALAN, PROPRIETOR OF M/S ASHOK FLOUR MILLS, HEM BARUAH ROAD, FANCY BAZAR, GHY-1 2:SANWARMAL JALAN S/O LT. CHOUTMAL JALAN PROPRIETOR OF M/S ASHOK FLOUR MILLS HEM BARUAH ROAD FANCY BAZAR GHY- Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S CHOUDHURY, MR.S BANIK Advocate for the Respondent : MR.T C DAS, MR.P SARMA,MR.S KHAN,MR.O P BHATI
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 15.09.2025
Mr. S. Banik, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that during the pendency of this proceeding, the alleged contemnors have expired and in view of such developments, the petitioner would not like to press this petition. However, he submits that he may be granted liberty to avail appropriate remedy. Considering above, the contempt petition stands closed with a liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy as may be permissible under the law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant