Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13530 (CHH)

INSTITUTE OF NURSING RESEARCH CENTRE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1954/2021 · 2025-06-16

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:24877 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1954 of 2021 • Institute Of Nursing Research Centre Through The Principal Institute Of Nursing Research Centre Krishnapur Kalwa, Bharuamunda Road, Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary To The Govt. Of Chhattisgarh Department Of Medical Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, P.S. Rakhi, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Director, Directorate Of Medical Education Old Nursing Hostel, Mantralaya Campus, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001 3. Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Memorial Health Sciences And Ayush University Through The Registrar Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Memorial Health Sciences And Ayush University G.E Road, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 and 2 For Respondent No. 3 : : Mr. Shubham Bajpai, Panel Lawyer Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 17/06/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10(1) to quash the decision of the Respondent-3 dated 27-03- 2021 : ANNEX-P/1 : with further direction to the Respondents to grant the affiliation to the Petitioner Institute for the academic year 2020-2021 for conducting the course of M.Sc (Nursing). Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10(2) to direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to take admission for the academic year 2020-2021 for conducting the course of M.Sc (Nursing). 10(3) any other relief, which the Hon’ble Court considers proper, may kindly be awarded. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous,therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti