VIDYADHAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/2257/2025 · 2025-04-30
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24847 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2257 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vidyadhar And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent(s) is dispensed with. Present petition has been filed for following main relief(s) - (i) To issue an order or direction through the opposite party No.2 Additional Commissioner Lucknow Mandal Lucknow decided / disposal pending Appeal Number / Suit Number 5359/2024 Computerized Appeal No. / Suit No. C-202410000005359/2024 (Ramesh and others Vs. Rajnarayan and others) U/s 207, U.P. Revenue Code- 2006, against the order dated 02.07.2024 In Revenue Village Avarohi Samariya, Pargana Tambour, Tehsil- Laharpur, District Sitapur which is pending before the Court opposite party No.2 Additional Commissioner Lucknow Mandal Lucknow which is contained as Annexure No.1 of the petition, just and proper in the interest of justice. (ii) Further prayer issue / order / direction Mandamus opposite parties No. 4, 5, 6 & 7 is not disturb peaceful possession of the petitioners land and peaceful cutting the whites crops and threshing in not interfere in field during pendency of the appeal number / Suit Number 5359/2024 before the opposite party No.2 in the interest of justice." Taking note of the facts indicated in the present petition as also that as per Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 read with Para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, a revision or appeal should be decided preferably within a period of six months and in the instant case, the appeal is pending since 2024, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2-Additional Commissioner, Lucknow Mandal, Lucknow to consider and decide the Appeal No. 5359 of 2024, quoted above, most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard.
It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 30.4.2025/Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench