SUMIT KHANDELWAL S/O NAVRATAN BADAYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/1820/2025 · 2025-07-14
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13529 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13529 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:26108] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1820/2025 Sumit Khandelwal S/o Navratan Badaya, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Plot No 269 ,agra Road ,behind Nand Mahal ,vrindavan Vihar ,colony Jaipur 302031, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Ratna Rawat D/o Late Gopal Lal Rawat, Aged About 56 Years, R/o 41, Rawat Place, Near Gangapole Gate, Bas Badanpura, P.s- Galta Gate, Jaipur North (Raj). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1269/2025
1. Devendra Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 91A, Prem Nagar First, Gurjar Ki Thadi, Jaipur 302019(Raj.)
2. Archana Sharma W/o Devendra Kumar Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 91A, Prem Nagar First, Gurjar Ki Thadi, Jaipur 302019(Raj.)
3. Arun Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Satvir Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Post -Achrol, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Suresh Shekhawat S/o Mahaveer Singh, Aged About 45 Years, Plot No. A-169-A, Gopalan Nagar, Khatipura, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Ratna Rawat D/o Late Gopal Lal Rawat, Aged About 56 Years, R/o 41, Rawat Place, Near Gangapole Gate, Bas Badanpura, Ps- Galta Gate, Jaipur North (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Kr. Sharma, in person Mr. Indresh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Krishan Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Mahendra Shandilya, Adv.
[2025:RJ-JP:26108] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1820/2025] For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Ghan Shyam Singh Rathore, Adv. Mr. Santosh Singh Shakhawat, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 14/07/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that challan has been filed in the instant matter and the petitioners are exonerated in the instant matter. Petitioner (present-in-person) has affirmed the above said contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to file fresh petition, if need so arises in future.
Liberty as prayed for, is granted. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. A copy of this order be placed in connected file.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /17-18