UPENDRA KUMAR NAHAK AND ANOTHER v. DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, LKO. THRU. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY AND 2 OTHERS
A227/2357/2025 · 2025-04-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24301
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2357 of 2025 Petitioner :- Upendra Kumar Nahak And Another Respondent :- Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lko. Thru. Prescribed Authority And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pooja Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sharad Kumar Shukla who appears for the respondent no.3.
3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that in terms of the order passed on 08.04.2025 by the DRT, certain amounts have been deposited, however, for the balance, sometime is required.
4. Considering the fact that an order has been passed by the DRT, the petitioner is at liberty to move an application for extension of time before the DRT. In case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered by the DRT in accordance with law.
5. The writ petition stands disposed off with the said observations. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench