Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13525 (RAJ)

LOKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ORS v. RAJ BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATI

CW/2327/2008 · 2025-02-06

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5352] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2327/2008 1. Lokesh Kumar Saini, Son of Shri Ghanshyam Saini, aged about 20 years resident of Behind Indra Gandhi Stadium, District Alwar. 2. Mukesh Saini, Son of Shri Roop Chand Saini, aged about 19 years, R/o Sonava ki Dungari, District Alwar. 3. Ravindra Singh, Son of Shri Janak Singh, aged about 21 years, resident of Ladiya Mohalla District Alwar. 4. Sanju Meena daughter of Shri Rameshwar Dayal Meena, aged about 21 years, resident of Meena Padi, District Alwar. 5. Seema Patel, Daughter of Chotte Lal aged about 20 years, resident of Mohalla Jhora Patel, District Alwar. 6. Siyaram Sharma, Son of Shri Leela Ram Sharma aged about 18 years, resident of Roopbas, District Alwar. 7. Sohal Lal Saini, Son of Shri Birdya Ram Saini, aged about 19 years, resident of Roopbas, District Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Rajasthan Board of Secondary Education, Ajmer, through its Secretary. 2. The Balika City Public Senior Secondary School, Kachery Road, Alwar, through its Principal. 3. The Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Devi Ji ki Gali, Alwar, through its Principal. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Namo Narayan Sharma on behalf of Mr. Banwari Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anjum Praveen Salawat on behalf of Mrs. Namita Parihar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 06/02/2025 As per the result of the petitioners submitted by learned counsel for the respondents, they all have failed. [2025:RJ-JP:5352] (2 of 2) [CW-2327/2008] In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this writ petition. This writ petition is dismissed accordingly. The result in original is returned to the learned counsel for the respondents. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J MAHIMA/40