Smt.Gopu Lakshumma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/25948/2016 · 2025-09-11
R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13521 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13521 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010163242016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 25948/2016 Between:
1. SMT.GOPU LAKSHUMMA,, W/O.LATE PEDA GANGANNA, KALAMALLA VILLAGE & POST, YERRAGUNTLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT , ANDHRA PRADESH - 516310
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT
4. THE TAHSILDAR, YERRAGUNTLA, YERRAGUNTLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT
5. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, YERRAGUNTLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT
6. GUJJALA VENKATA NARASIMHULU, S/O.LATE OBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.9/25, DEGREE COLLEGE ROAD, PULIVENDULA, PULIVENDULA POST & MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT
7.
PONNA SIVA RAMUDU, S/O.RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O.KALAMALLA (V), YARRAGUNTLA (M), KADAPA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings passed by the 5th respondent in SLR No. -Nil-dt.25.07.16 in respect of determination of the boundaries and measurements relating to Sy.No.82-1A in the notice and its execution /implementation on the original site of the petitioner under Sy.No.82/A1 of Yerraguntla Revenue Division is without jurisdiction, arbitrary, illegal and violation of Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Art.300 A of the Constitution of India and also the violation of Sec.15(1) and 22 of the AP survey and boundaries (extension and amendment Act 1958), and consequently set aside same IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 32065 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned notice passed the 5th respondent in SLR No. -Nil-dt.25.07.16 in respect of determination of the boundaries and measurements relating to Sy.No.82-1A as mentioned in the notice pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 10.8.2016 as made in WP.No. 25948 of 2016, and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the respondent No.4 to file the counter affidavit and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
GANESH BHUJANGA RAO VADDURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. VELAGANI NARASIMHULU
3. B V ANJANEYULU The Court made the following order:
There was no appearance for the petitioner on 14.08.2025 and the matter was posted for dismissal. There is no appearance for the petitioner to day also. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,J
RJS
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 25948/2016
12.09.2025
RJS