CRM-M-32355 207 IN THE Amarjit Singh State of Punjab CORAM: Present: SUMEET GO 1. Bharatiya Nag concession of 19.05.2025, re 304, 3(5) of the 2. Gill, PPS, Dep filed by the lea record. 3. 32355-2025 (O&M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of Singh versus Punjab HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, Advocate f Mr. Harsimran Singh Sidhu, Advo Mr. Gurpartap Singh Bhullar, AA ***** T GOEL, J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed a Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (f ion of anticipatory bail to the petitio 25, registered for offences punishable of the BNS, 2023, at Police Station Va Reply by way of an affidavit date S, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Su the learned State counsel, in the Court On 13.06.2025, the following ord “Contends, inter alia, that n the petitioner. Notice of motion. Mr. Prit Inder Pal Singh accepts notice on behalf of the re instructions and/or to file written re Posted for 28.07.2025. 1 NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH -M-32355-2025 (O&M) ate of decision: August 01, 2025 ....Petitioner ....Respondent SUMEET GOEL ocate for Advocate for the petitioner. ar, AAG Punjab. filed under Section 482 of the (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of petitioner in case FIR No.59 dated shable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), Vairoke, District Fazilka. it dated 27.07.2025 of Jatinder Singh ice, Sub Division, Jalalabad has been Court today, and the same is taken on ng order was passed: hat no injury has been attributed to ingh, learned Addl. A.G., Punjab the respondent; seeks time to have ten response in the matter. 1 ioner dent the nt of ated 5(2), ingh been n on to jab ave MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.01 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM-M-32355 4. has stated tha joined investig 5. of the record the conditions 6. be read grant confined to th other incident 7. cancellation/re stipulated und sufficient caus 8. be construed to 9. August 01, 20 mahavir Whether speakin Whether reportab 32355-2025 (O&M) In the meanwhile, petitioner the Investigating Officer; but he b of hearing.” Learned State counsel (on instruc ed that pursuant to the order dated vestigation, and his custodial interrog Having heard learned counsel fo cord, the interim order dated 13.06.20 itions as enumerated under Section 48 This order should not be treated granting petitioner indefinite protec to the FIR mentioned ibid and will cident that involves commission of an Liberty is reserved in favour of S tion/recall of this order in case the pe d under Section 482(2) of BNSS t cause. Needless to say that anything ob rued to be an opinion on the merits of Pending application(s), if any, sha , 2025 peaking/reasoned: Yes/No eportable: Yes/No 2 ioner shall join investigation before he be not arrested till the next date instructions from ASI Sawan Singh) ated 13.06.2025, the petitioner has terrogation is not required. sel for the parties and upon perusal .2025 is made absolute, subject to 482(2) of BNSS. eated as “blanket” order. It will not protection from arrest. It shall be d will not operate in respect of any f an offence. ur of State/complainant to move for the petitioner violates any condition NSS or upon showing any other ing observed herein above shall not rits of the case. ny, shall also stand disposed of. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 2 ore ate ) r has rusal ct to l not ll be any e for ition other l not MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.01 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment