Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22810 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 349 of 2025 Petitioner :- Tilakram And Others Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,Ravi Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:- "I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing proceeding of Revision No.1650, Computerized Case No.2019530423000037, Under Section-48 of U.P.C.H. Act, Haunsila Prasad Vs Santram & Others, filed against the order dated 18.12.2017 passed by Settlement Officer of Consolidation in Appeal No.1765/1947, related to Village-Abusarai, Pargana- Magalsi, Tehsil Sadar, District-Ayodhya (Faizabad), as contained as Annexure No.03 to this writ petition. II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding opposite party no.01 to decide the objection dated 17.02.2021 filed by petitioners regarding maintainability of revision as contained as Annexure No.05 to this writ petition. III) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding opposite parties to not create any hindrance in peaceful possession of petitioners over the land in question till disposal of case." On being confronted, after taking note of the settled principle of law with regard to quashing of the proceedings including the observations made by this Court passed in the case of Gulab Chandra Versus The Munsif West and Others reported in MANU/UP/0686/1988, learned Counsel for the petitioners says that he may be permitted to not press the prayer nos. 1 and 3 and the present petition may be considered only with regard to prayer no.2, and the present petition be disposed of with direction to opposite party no.1 to consider and decide the issue of maintainability raised by the petitioners in their objection dated 17.02.2021 first, on the next date fixed in the case, if possible, and if it is not possible, then within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party and thereafter proceed in the matter. Ordered accordingly. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 22.4.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench