Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 135196 (MAD)

Pichammal v. The State of Tamil Nadu

CRL OP(MD)/7527/2025 · 2025-04-24

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.7527 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD)No.7527 of 2025 Pichammal ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thirukostiyur Police Station, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to issue any orders or directions, directing the respondents to further investigate in C.S.R.No.74/2025 on the file of the 2nd respondent police dated 17.03.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivaprakash For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7527 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to further investigate in C.S.R.No.74/2025 on the file of the second respondent police dated 17.03.2025. 2.According to the petitioner, she lodged a complaint before the second respondent, for which, C.S.R.No.74 of 2025 has been assigned and thereafter, no action was taken. Therefore, the petitioner sent the representation dated 17.04.2025 and the same has also not been considered. Hence this petition. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that based on the petitioner's complaint, C.S.R.No.74 of 2025 has been assigned and the same was closed on 27.03.2025, due to non appearance of the petitioner. 4.Since the prayer of the petitioner is to conduct further investigation in C.S.R.No.74 of 2025 and the same has been closed due to the absence of the petitioner, the prayer has become infructuous. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7527 of 2025 However, the petitioner is at liberty either to challenge the closure of the complaint in the manner known to law, if she is aggrieved or to give a fresh representation. 5.With the said liberty, this criminal original petition is closed. 24.04.2025 Internet:Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR To 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thirukostiyur Police Station, Sivagangai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7527 of 2025 P. DHANABAL, J. LR Crl.O.P(MD)No.7527 of 2025 24.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis