STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. TINKU BENIWAL SON OF SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD BENIWAL
SAW/301/2025 · 2025-06-30
Maneesh Sharma, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13519 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13519 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23928-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 301/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8511/2022
1. State of Rajasthan, through its Home Secretary, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Director General of Police, Head Quarter, Jaipur (Raj.).
3. The Superintendent of Police, Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Appellants Versus
1. Tinku Beniwal Son of Shri Jagdish Prasad Beniwal, Aged About 28 Years, Resident of Village Kikariya, District Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Rajesh Kumar Son of Shri Ramswaroop, Aged About 28 Years, Resident of Village Rajpuriya Sidhmukh, District Churu(Raj) ----Respondents For Appellants : Mr. Samee Khan Advocate on behalf of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma Additional Advocate General.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 30/06/2025
1. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants fairly submits that the issue involved in this appeal has already been considered and decided by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Vinod Kumar Meena (D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.61/2024) decided on 05.04.2024.
[2025:RJ-JP:23928-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-301/2025]
2. In view of the above judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of State of Rajasthan Vs. Vinod Kumar Meena (supra), the present appeal stands dismissed.
3. Application for condonation of delay also stands dismissed.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ MANOJ NARWANI/104