Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 135153 (ALL)

PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

A483/329/2025 · 2025-09-10

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 329 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Shri Ashutosh Singh, Advocate has put in appearance by filing Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, the same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application under Section 483 Cr.P.C./ 529 BNSS has been filed with the following prayer:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C., District-Pratapgarh to decide the Session Trial No.1153/2022, State of U.P. V/s Tribhuwan Singh @Babbu and others, under section 147, 148, 149, 325, 307, 427, 302, 504, 506 IPC & section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station-Udaypur, District-Pratapgarh pending in the court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C., District-Pratapgarh, expeditiously within stipulated as fixed by this Hon'ble court, in the interest of justice." 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter is still pending consideration since 2021 and the applicant is suffering hard delay in conclusion of the trial proceedings. He urges that the interest of justice would be subserved if this Hon'ble Court is pleased enough to direct the Court below to conclude the proceedings of Criminal Case No. Session Trial No.1153/2022 (State of U.P. V/s Tribhuwan Singh @Babbu and others) within a stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. 5. The counsel for the opposite party no.2 as well as learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the contention made by learned Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jaikaran Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pramod Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 6 Others .....Opposite Party(s) counsel for the applicant. 6. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the Trial Court is hereby directed to conclude the proceeding of Session Trial No.1153/2022 (State of U.P. V/s Tribhuwan Singh @Babbu and others), arising out of Case Crime No.223/2021, under section 147, 148, 149, 325, 307, 427, 302, 504, 506 IPC & section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station-Udaypur, District-Pratapgarh, in expedition, if there is no legal impediment, while considering the guidelines and circulars issued time to time in this regard. 7. 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 10, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A483 No. 329 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench