Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13515 (CHH)

PRANITHA MOGHE @ PRANITA DESHPANDE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2017/2025 · 2025-03-26

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 5 2025:CGHC:14422 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2017 of 2025 1 - Pranitha Moghe @ Pranita Deshpande W/o M.L. Moghe Aged About 51 Years Currently Posted At Government High School Janjhi Block Masturi As Lecturer (Geography), Address At C/o Pratibha Deshpande, 201, Om Garden Near Gajanan Temple, Ganesh Chowk, Nehra Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Seema Agrawal @ Seema Namdev W/o Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal Aged About 54 Years Currently Posted At Government High School Janjhi Block Masturi As Lecturer (Biology), R/o Katiyapara, Udai Chowk, 9th Floor Of Dr. Motwani, Ward No. 35, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Navodita Patanwar W/o Aditya Patanwar Aged About 46 Years Currently Posted At Government High School Janjhi Block Masturi As Lecturer (Physics), R/o Near Saatbhahiniya Mandir, Arvind Nagar, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Poonam Tiwari @ Poonam Pandey W/o Vinod Tiwari Aged About 46 Years Currently Posted At Government High School Janjhi Block Masturi As Lecturer (Hindi), R/o Ramagreen City, Khamtrai, Baima Nagoi Road, Sarkanda Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Swapnil Verma W/o Manish Verma Aged About 41 Years Currently Posted At Government High School Janjhi Block Masturi As Lecturer SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.03.27 10:12:12 +0530 2 / 5 (Maths), R/o Amrit Kunj, Sarju Bagicha, Masan Ganj Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Afshan Khan D/o Mr. N.A. Khan Aged About 43 Years Currently Posted At Government High School Janjhi Block Masturi As Lecturer (English), R/o Main Road Rajendra Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 7 - Alka Rani Gupta W/o Sanjay Gupta Aged About 49 Years Currently Posted At Government High School Janjhi Block Masturi As Lecturer (Hindi), R/o Behind Sanjay Heights Jabdapara, Sarkanda Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Pratistha Dwivedi W/o Ramavatar Dwivedi Aged About 47 Years Currently Posted At Government High School Janjhi Block Masturi As Lecturer (Sanskrit), Address At C/o R.S. Dwivedi, House No. 17/678, Lane No. 3, Behind Telephone Exchage, Implipara Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 9 - Sunita Sahu W/o Gopal Prasad Sahu Aged About 40 Years Currently Posted At Government High School Janjhi Block Masturi As Lecturer (Commerce), R/o Raghu Vihar, Ashok Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 / 5 3 – Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Block Education Officer, Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 7 - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Ms. Akanksha Verma, Panel Lawyer (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 26/03/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking direction towards the respondent authorities for grant of Kramonnati Vetanman on completion of 10 years of service in view of the order dated 28.02.2024 passed by the Division Bench of this High Court in WA No. 261/2023 and also as per circular dated 10.03.2017 issued by the State Government of C.G. 2. The claim of the petitioners are with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has also 4 / 5 been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No. 261 of 2023, has also consider the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the competent authority in light of order dated 28/02/2024 passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents. 5. Against the order passed in WA No. 261 of 2023, the State preferred a review petition bearing REVP No. 147 of 2024, which was considered and rejected by a detailed order. There against the State filed an SLP before the Supreme Court bearing SLP (C) No. 58525 of 2024, which was dismissed by order dated 17.03.2025. 6. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the competent authority shall consider 5 / 5 the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 4 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar