Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 135127 (ALL)

SMT. HEERA DEVI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AGRICULTURE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/4265/2025 · 2025-04-21

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4265 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Heera Devi And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agriculture Education And Research U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deep Narayan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri D.N. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for opposite party no. 1 and Sri Satyanshu Osha, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos. 2 and 5, the same is taken on record. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the petitioners the arrears of differences of minimum of regular pay scale for class-IV posts as per VIIth pay commission report reducing the amount already paid to the husbands of the petitioners till the date of their respective regularization." Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2, i.e., Vice Chancellor and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2, i.e., Vice Chancellor ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law and in light of the judgement and order dated 21.01.2025 passed by this Court in Writ-A No. 692 of 2025, Ram Kishor Yadav and another Vs. State of U.P and 2 Others, verifying the applicability thereof in the present case after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. Order Date :- 21.4.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench