HARI NARAYAN KUMAWAT S/O SHRI RAMJEEVAN v. DISTRICT COLLECTOR
CW/5400/2022 · 2025-07-09
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13511 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13511 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:25312] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5400/2022 Hari Narayan Kumawat S/o Shri Ramjeevan, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Sadarpura, Tehsil Malpura, Tonk (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. District Collector, District Tonk (Rajasthan).
2. Sub Division Officer, Malpura, District Tonk (Rajasthan).
3. Tehsildaar, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr.Neeraj Batra, GC with Mr.Manoj Kumar & Ms.Gunjan Chawla JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 09/07/2025
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“It is, therefore, prayed that this Writ Petition of the petitioner may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or direction this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to:- a) Issue directions to the respondents to hand over the possession of the auctioned land as auctioned to the Petitioner vide order dated 22.06.2021 (Annexure-2) so passed by the Sub-Division Officer, Malpura. b) Issue directions to the respondent to pay the cost of Rs.10,000 for unnecessarily harassing the Petitioner and causing financial hardship/loss for no fault of him. c) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which may be considered just and
[2025:RJ-JP:25312] (2 of 3) [CW-5400/2022] proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly also be issued in favour of the petitioner.”
2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against the respondent-State to handover the possession of the auctioned land to him pursuant to the order dated 22.06.2021 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Malpura.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that repeatedly the petitioner has been informed on his mobile-phone for getting the possession of the subject land and even letter was also sent to him by the registered post on 25.11.2021, but for the reasons best known to the petitioner, he did not appear before the respondent to get the possession of the auctioned land. Counsel submits that still the respondents are ready to handover the possession of the subject land to the petitioner.
4. Considering the above stands taken by the respondent-State, the instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach in the Office of the State officials along-with the certified copy of this order within a period of four weeks from today. In case, any application is submitted by the petitioner before the respondents within the above stipulated time, the respondents are directed to handover the possession of the subject land to the petitioner within a period of four weeks thereafter.
5. Since, counsel for the petitioner has not appeared before this Court, petitioner has not aware about passing of the present
order, let a copy of this order be sent to the petitioner on his address in the memo of cause-title for his information and intimation.
[2025:RJ-JP:25312] (3 of 3) [CW-5400/2022]
6. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /76