- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:375 WP No. 982 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 982 OF 2021 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: BEML LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS BHARAT EARTH MOVERS LTD.,) HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT "BEML SOUDHA", NO.23/1, 4TH MAIN ROAD, SAMPANGIRAMANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. MR. RAVI KUMAR G., ASSISTANT MANAGER LEGAL. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. RAGHAVI.P., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NISCHAL DEV.B.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB), NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR, RASHTROTHANA BUILDING, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:375 WP No. 982 of 2021 ZONAL OFFICE OF KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, KRS ROAD, METAGALLI, MYSURU-570 016. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1; SRI. ASHOK.N.NAYAK., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Raghavi.P., counsel on behalf of Sri.Nischal Dev.B.R., for the petitioner, Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondent No.1 and Sri.Ashok N.Nayak., counsel for respondent No.2 have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the Notice dated 03.08.2017 issued by the second respondent in No.IADB/MYS/3530/1565/2017-18 under Section 34B of KIAD Act to the petitioner vide Annexure-A and also to quash the Notice dated 11.10.2019 issued by the second respondent in No.KIADB/HO/ALLOT/3530/10,000/2019- - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:375 WP No. 982 of 2021 20 vide Annexure-B and all other proceedings pursuant to the said proceedings under Section 34B of KIAD Act. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. Suffice it to note that the second respondent has issued Notices to the petitioner. If at all the petitioner has any grievance about the notices, the petitioner can reply suitably to the same. Hence, I decline to exercise power under Writ jurisdiction. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 18