SMT. URMILA v. U.O.I.MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS,RAIL COACH FACTORY THRU.ITS FINANCE ADVISOR RCF/KANPURTHALA AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/4261/2025 · 2025-04-21
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135084 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135084 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22491 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4261 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Urmila Respondent :- U.O.I.Ministry Of Railways,Rail Coach Factory Thru.Its Finance Advisor Rcf/Kanpurthala And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Yadav,Mahendra Kumar Rawat Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Ankit Srivastava,Ruby Choudhary Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.B.Pandey, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Shri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 to 3 and Ms. Ruby Chaudhary, Advocate, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent nos. 4 and 5, which is taken on record.
2. Upon objection being raised by learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioner has alternative statutory remedy to approach Central Administrative Tribunal for redressal of her grievance, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may given liberty to approach Central Administrative Tribunal.
3. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed on account of availability of statutory remedy, however, it is provided that if the petitioner approached Central Administrative Tribunal for redressal of her grievance, the claim of the petitioner shall be considered and decided on merit
expeditiously. Order Date :- 21.4.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench