Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13506 (RAJ)

BADRILAL S/O MATHURALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/7351/2023 · 2025-04-16

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:16175] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7351/2023 1. Badrilal S/o Mathuralal, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Village Chainpuria, Tehsil Mangrol District Baran Rajasthan. 2. Shyoraj @ Shivlal S/o Mathuralal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Chainpuria, Tehsil Mangrol District Baran Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. The District Collector, Baran District Baran Rajasthan. 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Mangrol District Baran. 4. Tehsildar Mangrol, District Baran. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.R. Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Gunjan Chawla Mr. Harshit Parashar for Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/04/2025 1. The matter comes up on an application for early listing of the writ petition. For the reasons stated therein, the same is allowed. 2. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing. 3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that they are in agreement that a direction be issued to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Mangrol District Baran to expeditiously decide the application, which is pending for adjudication since 2006. [2025:RJ-JP:16175] (2 of 2) [CW-7351/2023] 4. Considering the aforesaid limited prayer and the consent given by both the sides, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mangrol, District Bundi to decide the application expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 6. Before parting with the order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Mangrol District Baran to decide the appeal of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/138