ANIL KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRu. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/4289/2025 · 2025-04-28
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135046 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 135046 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23981 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4289 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Pandey,Ram Narain,Rupesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Shri Pawan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vivek Shukla, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the opposite parties No. 1 to 5. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party No.6 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 to consider the regularisation of the petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher (Physical Education) in pursuance of the proposal dated 21.11.2024 sent by the opposite party No. 6 to the opposite party Nos. 3 and 5 contained as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to allow the petitioner to discharge his duties as Assistant Teacher (Physical Education) and pay him salary each month regularly as and when it falls due."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e., Chairman, Regional Level Committee, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 6.
Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e., the Chairman, Regional Level Committee, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 28.4.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench