Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23691 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3426 of 2025 Applicant :- Salman and Jawed Ansari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Arshad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of opposite party-State. 1A. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. This first bail application has been filed with regard to Case Crime No.50 of 2025 under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Ramnagar, District Barabanki. 3. As per gang chart, applicants are shown involved in three cases bearing Case Crime No.575 of 2024, Case Crime No.613 of 2024 and Case Crime No.616 of 2024 in which they have been enlarged on bail by court below vide Bail Applications numbered 3481 of 2024; 794 of 2024 and 895 of 2024. 4. It is submitted that apart from aforesaid case, applicants are shown involved in two more cases the details of which have been explained in Bail Application as well as in supplementary affidavit in which they are enlarged on bail in all the cases. 5. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer for bail but does not dispute the fact that applicants are enlarged on bail in all the cases indicated against them. 6. Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40 has specifically held that bail is to be a norm and an under-trial is not required to be in jail for ever pending trial. Relevant paragraphs of the judgment are as under :- "21. In bail applications, generally, it has been laid down from the earliest times that the object of bail is to secure the appearance of the accused person at his trial by reasonable amount of bail. The object of bail is neither punitive nor preventative. Deprivation of liberty must be considered a punishment, unless it is required to ensure that an accused person will stand his trial when called upon. The courts owe more than verbal respect to the principle that punishment begins after conviction, and that every man is deemed to be innocent until duly tried and duly found guilty." "27. This Court, time and again, has stated that bail is the rule and committal to jail an exception. It has also observed that refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of the individual guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution." 7. Upon consideration of submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perusal of material on record, prima facie, and subject to further evidence being led in trial, it appears that applicants have already been enlarged on bail in all the cases filed against them as averred in the affidavit/supplementary affidavit filed in support of the application and therefore conditions indicated in Section 19(4) U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 stand complied with at this stage, therefore the applicants are entitled to be released on bail in this case. 8. Accordingly bail application is allowed. 9. Let applicants Salman and Jawed Ansari involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on each of them furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iii) In case, the applicants misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iv) The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court, absence of the applicants is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against them in accordance with law. Order Date :- 25.4.2025 kvg/- Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench