HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1273 of 2024 Gulbahar ......Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….Respondent Present:- Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the applicant through video conferencing. Mr. V.S. Rawat, AGA for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant Gulbahar seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No. 205 of 2024, under Section 25(1-B) (a) & Section 3 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 307 IPC, Police Station Jhabrera, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail. 4. This fact is not disputed by the learned State Counsel. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer 2 (“AO”). In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation. (ii) He shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (iii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the court concerned. (iv) He shall deposit his passport with the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 25.03.2025 Avneet/